SS&C Blog - Insights, Tips, and Industry Trends | SS&C

Comparing the Risk and Rewards of LP versus GP-Led Transactions

Written by Ian Kelly | Dec 19, 2024 12:24:29 PM

The private equity secondary market is evolving rapidly, driven by a unique balance of risks and rewards across GP-led, LP-led, and direct secondary transactions. Each transaction type offers distinct opportunities and challenges, making careful evaluation of risk-reward ratios essential for investors navigating this space. We recently produced "The Secondary Market" report in partnership with Private Equity Wire, in which we explore the risk-reward ratios of direct secondaries transactions.

GP-Led Transactions

GP-led transactions present opportunities for investors willing to engage with their concentrated risk profiles. Historically, these transactions were associated with restructuring underperforming funds. However, they are now increasingly used for continuation vehicles, enabling GPs to retain and further develop key assets. Our research shows that 36% of secondary transactions over the past 12 months were GP-led. This shift reflects a growing understanding of the benefits and challenges these vehicles offer.

The concentrated nature of GP-led deals typically involves longer holding periods and heightened asset-specific risks. For investors, the trade-off lies in the potential for outsized returns on "crown jewel" assets. With the continued adoption of such structures by top-tier GPs, the market is gradually warming to these opportunities, particularly as education about their mechanics improves. As this segment evolves, it offers a path for high-conviction investors to align with GPs on long-term value creation.

LP-Led Transactions

LP-led transactions remain the cornerstone of the secondary market, delivering diversification and liquidity. With approximately $3.2 trillion in unsold assets globally, the backlog of PE buyout books presents significant opportunities for secondary transactions. LP-led deals offer investors exposure to a broad portfolio of assets, often resembling a private equity index with more immediate cash flows and robust distribution to paid-in (DPI) ratios.

The diversification in LP-led transactions tends to mitigate risk, making them appealing to a wider range of investors, including those seeking liquidity solutions without severing relationships with existing GPs. Despite macroeconomic uncertainties like fluctuating interest rates and geopolitical tensions, this segment has shown resilience, consistently attracting high transaction volumes.

Direct Secondaries and Emerging Trends

Direct secondaries, including NAV lending and credit secondaries, are gaining traction. Credit secondaries, in particular, are seeing transaction sizes comparable to those in the equity market. This emerging space caters to managers who can handle both equity and credit investments, offering a compelling risk-reward dynamic.

The evolving tools and strategies in direct secondaries allow investors to address unique needs, such as generating liquidity or managing portfolio composition effectively. However, these transactions often require a deep understanding of asset-specific risks and operational complexities.

Balancing Risk and Reward

Investors are drawn to the perceived stability and liquidity secondary transactions can offer amid uncertainties. At the same time, the nuanced risk-reward profiles across transaction types mean that careful due diligence and strategic alignment with GPs or LPs are critical for achieving desired outcomes.

The private equity secondary market continues to demonstrate resilience and adaptability. By understanding the distinct risk-reward dynamics across GP-led, LP-led and direct secondary transactions, investors can position themselves to capitalize on opportunities while managing inherent risks in this fast-moving sector. 

Read the full "The Secondary Market" report to learn more about the emerging trends in the secondaries market.