Performance fees are a common feature in hedge funds, designed to align the interests of fund managers with investors. However, ensuring these fees are calculated fairly can be complex. To address this, hedge funds use one of two main accounting methods: series accounting and equalization accounting. Let’s explore these methods, their differences and their impact on investors.
Why Are Performance Fees Important?
Performance fees are meant to reward fund managers for generating returns above a certain threshold. However, without proper accounting, investors subscribing at different times could end up paying fees unfairly—a scenario often referred to as the "free ride." To eliminate this issue, funds adopt accounting methodologies like Series Accounting or Equalization Accounting that ensure fairness across all investors. But are these methods truly equitable?
Industry Trends: How Performance Fees Have Evolved
The 2008 financial crisis reshaped the hedge fund landscape. Investors started demanding higher returns and became less willing to pay high fees for underperformance. This led to significant changes in standard fee structures:
- Decline in the 2%/20% Model: The traditional 2% management fee and 20% performance fee arrangement began shifting.
- Focus on Customization: Trends towards lower management fees, often tiered, paired with higher performance fees based on benchmarks, hurdles or tiered returns.
- More Complex Calculations: Funds increasingly adding complexity through the use of tiers and hurdles and considering combining series accounting and equalization accounting within their structures to attract a wider base of investors.
Series Accounting: Breaking It Down
Series Accounting is a methodology designed to ensure that performance fees are fair to the fund manager, while being equitably distributed among investors. This approach works by issuing a new series of shares for each subscription. When investors subscribe to the fund, the new series ensures that fees are calculated based on each investor’s specific entry point, maintaining fairness across the board.
Performance fees are calculated separately for each series, preventing latecomers from benefiting unfairly from earlier gains. This eliminates the possibility of “free rides” and ensures that all investors contribute appropriately based on their individual investment performance.
At the end of the performance period, profitable series have their fees crystallized, meaning the fees are finalized and deducted. Once this process is complete, the series are consolidated into the lead series. This process ensures investors within the same series are treated equally and fees are directly tied to the timing and performance of their investment.
One key aspect of Series Accounting is that it does not allow for a single NAV/share across all series. This is because each series operates independently and is tied to the specific timing and performance of the investors' entry points. Instead, each series has its own NAV/share, reflecting its unique performance. If a particular series does not perform well, it may not accrue performance fees, ensuring that investors are not charged for underperformance. Over time, initially underperforming series may be consolidated into the lead series, aligning all investors while maintaining fairness and accuracy in reflecting the investment outcomes.
Equalization Accounting: Ensuring Fairness Across a Single NAV
Equalization Accounting takes a unique approach to ensure fairness by "equalizing" performance fees for all investors in a fund with a single net asset value (NAV) per share. This method calculates fees at both the fund and investor levels, addressing timing differences in subscriptions to ensure equitable treatment.
One key element of this approach is the use of equalization credits and contingent redemptions. If an investor’s high-water mark (HWM) is above the fund's HWM, they owe less in fees and may receive an equalization credit. In this case, shares are issued to the investor on the crystallization date. Conversely, if an investor’s HWM is below the fund's HWM, they owe more in fees and may face a contingent redemption, where shares are redeemed from the investor on the crystallization date and paid to the manager.
By accounting for these differences, Equalization Accounting ensures that all investors are treated fairly and equitably, regardless of when they joined the fund.
While both methods aim to provide fair performance fee calculations, the debate over which is better continues. Series Accounting offers greater clarity by isolating fees within each series, showing the return at a series (investment date) level, while Equalization Accounting provides a single fund-level performance fee and NAV—it is more complex (particularly with the use of hurdles). Ultimately, the choice depends on the fund's structure and the preferences of its investors.
Performance fees are a vital component of hedge funds, incentivizing managers to deliver exceptional returns. Whether through Series Accounting or Equalization Accounting, the goal is to ensure fairness and alignment between fund managers and investors. As the hedge fund industry continues to evolve, these methodologies will remain central to building trust and maintaining investor confidence.
Contact us to learn more about how SS&C can help.
